Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scenarica's avatar

Since you asked what you're missing: the single fact you put at the centre, that Japan's debt is held at home by its own savers and its central bank, is also what makes Japan a shaky template for the US. Same trap, different lungs.

Domestically-held debt is the most stable kind there is. Captive holders can't rotate into another sovereign, and the central bank can pin yields almost indefinitely. That's why Japan has carried 250% for years without a creditor run: domestic financing is structural slack, not fragility. The US is financed the opposite way, heavily by foreign creditors who can rotate out, which puts its pressure point on the bond side rather than the currency side. So the two run closer to mirror images than to a sequence. Japan's weak spot is the currency while its bond base holds. the US has the reserve currency Japan lacks, but a creditor base that can actually leave. Both central banks pick the slow death, that part holds. Which death, and how fast, is set by the financing structure, and that's the one variable where Tokyo and Washington are opposites.

The part I'd watch hardest is the one you flagged as unmeasurable: the carry trade. The 2024 tremor mattered less for its size than for what it revealed, a quarter-point was enough to move global markets, which tells you the position is crowded and one-way. The risk there is less the level of Japanese rates than the shape of the position, leveraged and single-direction, unwinding through one door at once. You can't price that tail ahead of time, which is exactly why it stays underpriced until it doesn't.

Simon's avatar

Excellent explanation on Japan, did you read my comments on last week's essay? I need to check but have the figure of 300% debt in my mind. Regardless, the carry trade is indeed the biggest unknown consequence now. I still think that the new Japanese government is going to press on with economy expansion, funded by cash. Hence the dumping of Treasury Bonds - and the interest rate shift, honestly I have read that is a consequence of Trump's rudeness to the PM.

Then what happens?!!!

One thing I would love your take on is the emerging sub prime scenario. The AI goldrush has stimulated speculative data centres developments, mostly funded by banks rather than IPOs etc. with very obvious due diligence failures also emerging. All of a sudden annual reviews are flagging cold feet over loan terms and timescales, and silent on logistics and real world dependencies like the supply of diesel to fuel backup generators, or inadequate generation capacity and inadequate grid capacity likewise affected by current real world issues! Not so subtly, the banks are once again repackaging and offloading this debt targeting institutional investors. The regulators are doing nothing, and governments are saying that they want to deregulate 2010 controls further???!!!

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?